Why not play high-definition TV instead of gaming monitor?

By | May 12, 2018

Why not play high-definition TV instead of gaming monitor?

Why not play high-definition TV instead of gaming monitor? We have been in the position of being a gamer for 20 years. So we never thought of using a TV screen to play games. This is also a general trend for many others. Although the TV has many prominent prominent advantages such as high resolution and image quality as well, even more.

Today’s modern TVs do more than that. Like PCs, they use the HDMI protocol. They also support the same resolution as a gaming monitor (720p, 1080p and 4K). In addition, they have a display frequency of up to 120-240Hz. Even though there are still monitors that own frequency larger than 60Hz. But compared to the market most popular at 60Hz, the TV actually stands on a level. Theoretically, a 4K TV will provide a much better experience than usual. However, the reality is not always as simple as you think.

1. The delay of playing the game on the TV

Best cheap gaming monitor under 200

First of all, the lag of data processing. Basically, it’s a lag since you hit the mouse / keyboard / mouse control button until it’s done successfully. Many have argued that it is mostly available on console gaming consoles. But if the TV is used as a gaming monitor will suffer the same fate. One particular thing to keep in mind is that the lag on the best TV is still higher than the one seen in the segment. Specifically, the best quality screen will have a latency of about 9-10ms. And for high-end TV, it’s at least 17-18ms.

Actually, 17-18ms is not too big and bad. Because it is still considered excellent on the display scale. And unless you’re a fan of pure FPS or RTS titles. You will hardly notice the difference. Even so, it’s comforting only on high-end TVs. On the other hand, a large part does not carry 40ms (Good on the scale). This limitation can be more or less improved within the settings and the settings of the TV. But depending on the manufacturer and the default ability of the TV. Moreover, few brands pay close attention to this aspect. So if users are interested, they will have to rely on third party testing services such as DisplayLag site.

2. Incorrect display of the TV compared to the gaming monitor

Best cheap gaming monitor under 200

Next up is the scan and display problem. This is the standard attached to displaying a full picture, the most comprehensive on the actual screen size. And this will not show overwrite or cut. This is a downside that pre-LCD TV. You may find that there is no guarantee that the products from every brand are the same and that they fit your needs. The solution to this is to properly zoom in / out the image, resulting in a streak that will appear at several edges around the TV screen.

Most LCD TVs now have solutions for such situations. But keep in mind if you are using a slightly older product. Because it will not give you any choice on the sidelines. In addition, graphics cards from AMD and Nvidia may somehow compensate and fill that down on their software processing platform. But it will certainly limit some of the realism of the text area, the font display.

Finally, whether the TV actually has the ability to own display frequency up to 120Hz is common. But it depends on the brand. Therefore, you will not always have the best product. You will find them worse if you do not know how to choose subtle, correct.

3. No room for Adaptive Sync / FreeSync / G-Sync

Best cheap gaming monitor under 200

This is really the point that makes the difference. If you’ve had the time to stick with a monitor that supports Adaptive Sync (FreeSync on AMD) or G-Sync. You will immediately recognize what it does, even if you only play the game at 60 FPS. The lower the frame rate, the more synchronization features play an important role in smoothing images by extending the distance between frames.

G-Sync is also referred to here as a similar function integrated into Nvidia’s products. And the company never intended to bring it up for development on the TV screen. AMD’s VESA standard – Adaptive Sync – could theoretically be possible in the future when it comes to TVs. But only if its parameters match the HDMI protocol already. Up to now, HDMI 2.0 port is not enough. HDMI 2.1 is just in the startup phase, which means that at least a few more years before we can see the progress. But Adaptive Sync can really help improve the overall experience for gamers when playing on a TV screen.

If you want to try gaming on a large screen TV. You need to weigh the options carefully. Finally, search Google for high-compatibility and highly recommended product models that are easy to customize and appropriate for external hardware. Hopefully in the near future, TV will be able to make new exploits in the field of PC Gaming.